Large platforms are often accused of refusing to serve (or discriminating against) competing sellers in adjacent product markets. Antitrust law labels such activity a unilateral “refusal to deal” (“RTD”) and evaluates it under a predation-like framework shaped by the two leading RTD cases, Aspen and Trinko. However, this framework is largely unhelpful in evaluating platform RTDs, because it does not ask the right economic questions. The relevant economic risk raised by pla
...THIS ARTICLE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR IP ADDRESS 3.142.195.79
Please verify email or join us to access premium content!