By: Steven Salop (ProMarket)
The consumer welfare standard, the guiding principle for Antitrust practice and enforcement for much of recent history, may be coming to an end. Ideas for replacing the existing “consumer” label with a more inclusive or general term, such as “trading partner” welfare, include considering standards such as competitive process protection, effective competition, protecting competition, inclusive growth, anti-monopoly, and freedom from domination.
As for author Steven Salop, his own choice is the “Reasonable Competitive Conduct” (“RCC”) standard, which is a hyprid sharing some of the basic concerns and features of other standards mentioned above, including a recognition of the importance of trading partner welfare, while making an effort to maintain the language and spirit of the Sherman, Clayton, and FTC Acts.
In this short article, the author focuses the standard more narrowly, to describe what might be referred to as “vertical coercion”, and addressing two separate, and sometimes conflicting, concerns…
Featured News
Big Tech Braces for Potential Changes Under a Second Trump Presidency
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
Trump’s Potential Shift in US Antitrust Policy Raises Questions for Big Tech and Mergers
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU Set to Fine Apple in First Major Enforcement of Digital Markets Act
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Six Indicted in Federal Bid-Rigging Schemes Involving Government IT Contracts
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Ireland Secures First €3 Billion Apple Tax Payment, Boosting Exchequer Funds
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI