Chile’s National Economic Prosecutor (FNE) has asked its legally empowered counterpart, the TDLC, to press charges against several shipping and transport companies operating out of the Antofagasta harbor over their failure to live up to a series of conditions, meant to prevent excessive vertical integration between these “relevant users” of Antofagasta infrastructure. Antofagasta Terminal Internacional, Inversiones Punta de Rieles and SAAM Puertos are among the major companies involved.
The FNE is expected to request a $2.1 million dollar fine on the companies for failure to comply with the decisions of the Central Prevention Commission, which had limited these companies (shippers, loaders and dockworkers) from joining to control over 15% of the region’s tonnage, or over 25% of all tonnage moved while participating with under 40% ownership.
Both SAAM and Punta de Rieles are thought to have far surpassed the upper limits, making these companies ‘Relevant Actors’ and therefore liable to special restrictions. These companies are all somewhat related to the Luksic Group, a holding company for all three enterprises and their subsidiaries. The FNE’s restrictions had initially been set in order to prevent any single actors from dominating the local and vital Antofagasta shipping market.
Full Content: Diario Financiero
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Belgian Authorities Detain Multiple Individuals Over Alleged Huawei Bribery in EU Parliament
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Grubhub’s Antitrust Case to Proceed in Federal Court, Second Circuit Rules
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Pharma Giants Mallinckrodt and Endo to Merge in Multi-Billion-Dollar Deal
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Targets Meta’s Market Power, Calls Zuckerberg to Testify
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
French Watchdog Approves Carrefour’s Expansion, Orders Store Sell-Off
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li