Federal Judge Declines Demand for US College Sports Pay Data in Wage-Fixing Case
In a recent ruling, a federal judge has rejected the request to compel the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) to disclose individual assistant coaches’ pay data across the United States. The decision marks a setback for plaintiffs in an ongoing class-action lawsuit accusing the NCAA of conspiring to suppress wages for unpaid coaches, reported Reuters.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Kendall Newman, presiding over the case in Sacramento, sided with the NCAA, stating that the organization did not possess the information sought by the plaintiffs. Judge Newman underscored that the NCAA’s bylaws, which allow it to obtain information from member schools, were not intended to serve as a discovery mechanism for the plaintiffs.
Read more: NCAA Calls $1.3 Billion Antitrust Lawsuit Speculative
The legal action involves unpaid coaches who allege that the NCAA, along with more than 300 member schools in its Division I, engaged in an unlawful agreement to pay them nothing, forming a wage-fixing conspiracy. The plaintiffs, consisting of coaches from various sports, including baseball, tennis, indoor track, soccer, and lacrosse, claim they were unfairly denied compensation.
Despite the setback, the NCAA faces ongoing legal challenges. The organization lost its initial attempt to dismiss the two lawsuits, both filed last year. The NCAA’s Division I took a step in response to the legal scrutiny, amending its rules in January to allow teams to compensate additional coaches, thereby eliminating volunteer positions.
An NCAA spokesperson did not immediately respond to requests for comment, while the NCAA continues to deny any wrongdoing. Garrett Broshuis, an attorney representing the plaintiffs, expressed determination to pursue the case, stating, “We look forward to continuing to prosecute this case on behalf of these coaches, who were unfairly denied compensation for far too many years.”
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Big Tech Braces for Potential Changes Under a Second Trump Presidency
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
Trump’s Potential Shift in US Antitrust Policy Raises Questions for Big Tech and Mergers
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU Set to Fine Apple in First Major Enforcement of Digital Markets Act
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Six Indicted in Federal Bid-Rigging Schemes Involving Government IT Contracts
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Ireland Secures First €3 Billion Apple Tax Payment, Boosting Exchequer Funds
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI