French Senators Criticize Government’s Role in EU AI Act Negotiations Amidst Allegations of Lobbyist Influence
The ongoing negotiations surrounding the European Union’s AI Act have taken a contentious turn as French senators voiced their concerns over the government’s position. The focus of the criticism revolves around perceived inadequacies in copyright protection and alleged influence from a lobbyist with reported conflicts of interest, including former digital state secretary Cédric O.
The EU AI Act, slated to be the world’s first comprehensive regulation of artificial intelligence, has been a focal point for policymakers since the rise of advanced AI models like GPT-4, as exemplified by the AI system ChatGPT.
During a government question time on Wednesday, centrist senator Catherine Morin-Desailly accused Cédric O and the company Mistral of attempting to weaken the AI regulation bill proposed by the European Commission. Morin-Desailly claimed, “We know that Cédric O and Mistral influenced the French government’s position regarding the AI regulation bill, attempting to weaken it.”
The senator also raised concerns about the alleged conflicts of interest involving Cédric O, stating, “The press reported on the spectacular enrichment of the former digital minister, Cédric O. He entered the company Mistral, where the interests of American companies and investment funds are prominently represented. This financial operation is causing shock within the Intergovernmental Committee on AI you have established, Madam Prime Minister.”
Read more: EU Reaches ‘Milestone’ On Road To Regulating AI
In response to these accusations, Digital Minister Jean-Noël Barrot vehemently denied any wrongdoing, asserting, “It is the High Authority for Transparency in Public Life that ensures the absence of conflicts of interest among former government members.”
Barrot also refuted claims that France had become a spokesperson for private interests, arguing that the government “listened to all stakeholders as it is customary and relied solely on the general interest as our guiding principle.”
The allegations bring to light the challenges faced by regulators as they navigate the complex landscape of AI governance. As the world awaits the outcome of the EU AI Act negotiations, the role of lobbyists and their potential impact on shaping policies designed to regulate powerful AI models remains a topic of intense scrutiny.
Source: Euractiv
Featured News
Big Tech Braces for Potential Changes Under a Second Trump Presidency
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
Trump’s Potential Shift in US Antitrust Policy Raises Questions for Big Tech and Mergers
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU Set to Fine Apple in First Major Enforcement of Digital Markets Act
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Six Indicted in Federal Bid-Rigging Schemes Involving Government IT Contracts
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Ireland Secures First €3 Billion Apple Tax Payment, Boosting Exchequer Funds
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI