Visa and Mastercard, two of the world’s largest credit card companies, have moved to dismiss antitrust claims filed against them by Intuit and Square, citing a $5.6 billion class-action settlement finalized last year with merchants, as reported by Law360.
The legal battle centers around allegations that Visa and Mastercard engaged in anticompetitive behavior by fixing interchange rates paid by merchants to accept their cards. Intuit, the financial software company, initiated its antitrust lawsuit in 2021, followed by Block-owned Square in the subsequent year.
According to the credit card giants, merchants who chose not to opt out of the settlement released not only their own claims but also those of their “agents,” which Visa and Mastercard argue should include payment processors like Intuit and Square. In a memorandum filed on January 31st, Visa and Mastercard contended that both Intuit and Square were designated as “payment agents” in their contracts with merchants, thus their claims were released as part of the settlement.
Furthermore, Visa and Mastercard asserted that enforcing the terms of the settlement should result in the dismissal of claims brought by Intuit and Square. They argued that class counsel never aimed to represent payment facilitators or processors because they were not directly affected by the alleged anticompetitive practices. Instead, the claims of these entities were released as part of the settlement by the merchants they served.
Read more: FTC Probes Competition In Visa, Mastercard Debit Routing Practices
Additionally, Visa and Mastercard maintained that third-party processors like Intuit and Square should be considered indirect purchasers under federal law, thereby barring them from seeking damages. They warned that allowing the claims from Intuit and Square to proceed could jeopardize the inclusion of their client merchants in the class settlement.
In response, Intuit has sought a partial summary judgment ruling, asserting its antitrust standing as a payment facilitator. The company argued that it is the “most direct payor” of interchange fees to Visa and Mastercard and emphasized that it opted out of the settlement to preserve its individual claims against the companies, per Law360.
“Defendants do not dispute the facts showing that Intuit is the direct payor of interchange fees and ‘merchant of record’ on all [facilitator] transactions, and never assigned away its claims based on the direct payment of interchange fees,” Intuit stated in its filing.
The legal dispute underscores the complex web of relationships within the payment processing ecosystem and the significant financial stakes involved for all parties. As the case unfolds in the New York federal court, the outcome could have far-reaching implications for the future of competition within the credit card industry.
Source: Law 360
Featured News
Big Tech Braces for Potential Changes Under a Second Trump Presidency
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
Trump’s Potential Shift in US Antitrust Policy Raises Questions for Big Tech and Mergers
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU Set to Fine Apple in First Major Enforcement of Digital Markets Act
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Six Indicted in Federal Bid-Rigging Schemes Involving Government IT Contracts
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Ireland Secures First €3 Billion Apple Tax Payment, Boosting Exchequer Funds
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI