U.S. heart valve manufacturer Edwards Lifesciences finds itself at the center of an EU antitrust complaint filed by its Indian competitor, Meril. The complaint alleges anti-competitive practices related to patents, potentially amplifying the scrutiny of EU regulators on Edwards.
Meril, known for its innovative contributions to the medical field, has taken the legal route by lodging a complaint with the European Commission, according to statements provided to Reuters. The clash between the two companies has been long-standing, with battles over heart valve patents echoing in courtrooms across the globe for several years.
Edwards Lifesciences, a prominent player recognized for its transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) device in heart surgery, has been under regulatory radar since last year when the EU antitrust watchdog raided its premises on suspicions of market power abuse, as per Reuters reports.
Meril’s complaint specifically targets Edwards’ global unilateral pro-innovation policy, which Meril alleges aims to stifle competition by obstructing interactions between doctors and entities labeled as patent copiers by Edwards.
Moreover, Meril has raised concerns over Edwards’ patent practices, citing instances of evergreening and patent thickets. Evergreening, a controversial tactic in the pharmaceutical realm, involves extending patents on products through minor alterations, while patent thickets refer to the practice of securing multiple patents for minor variations on a single invention.
In response to these accusations, Edwards has vehemently denied any wrongdoing, asserting that it has lawfully secured injunctions against Meril’s Myval system in seven countries and the Unified Patent Court for infringement of its SAPIEN valve and accessory patents.
Edwards defended its actions by claiming that it pursued legal action against Meril due to what it perceives as substantial copying of its technology, rather than fair competition and independent innovation. The company emphasized the importance of intellectual property rights in fostering innovation, stating that such protections are indispensable in advancing life-saving therapies that benefit millions of patients worldwide.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Big Tech Braces for Potential Changes Under a Second Trump Presidency
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
Trump’s Potential Shift in US Antitrust Policy Raises Questions for Big Tech and Mergers
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU Set to Fine Apple in First Major Enforcement of Digital Markets Act
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Six Indicted in Federal Bid-Rigging Schemes Involving Government IT Contracts
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Ireland Secures First €3 Billion Apple Tax Payment, Boosting Exchequer Funds
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI