In a detailed interim report, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has highlighted significant concerns over the consolidation of pharmacies and health insurance companies, pointing to the outsized influence a few pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) now wield over prescription drug prices. The FTC’s findings, revealed on Tuesday, underscore the impact of years of deal-making in the sector.
According to Reuters, PBMs act as intermediaries between drug manufacturers and consumers, playing a crucial role in negotiating volume discounts, setting lists of covered medications, and reimbursing pharmacies for prescriptions. The FTC’s interim report claims that the three largest PBMs — UnitedHealth Group’s Optum, CVS Health Corp’s CVS Caremark, and Cigna’s Express Scripts — manage 79% of U.S. prescription drug claims, a dominance that has allegedly led to substantial financial gains at the expense of smaller pharmacies and consumers.
“These powerful middlemen may be profiting by inflating drug costs and squeezing Main Street pharmacies,” the FTC stated, following a two-year investigation into the PBMs’ influence on prescription drug prices. FTC Chair Lina Khan emphasized the agency’s commitment to scrutinizing dominant players in the healthcare markets, vowing to use all available tools and authorities to ensure fair competition and protect consumers.
Read more: French Drugmaker Servier Loses Appeal Against EU Fine for “Pay-for-Delay” Deals
The report provides rare insights into the contracting practices of major PBMs, such as CVS Caremark, particularly in terms of formulary placement—the list of medications covered by insurance plans. It also details the recent creation of group purchasing organizations (GPOs) by these PBMs. Traditionally, GPOs are companies that buy drugs and medical supplies for healthcare providers, but the new PBM GPOs are responsible for negotiating contracts and rebates with drug manufacturers, a task previously handled directly by PBMs.
This development has further consolidated the market, potentially exacerbating the issues identified by the FTC. By creating these GPOs, the largest PBMs may have increased their leverage over drug pricing and availability, raising additional concerns about market transparency and competition.
As the FTC continues its investigation, the findings of this interim report could pave the way for greater regulatory scrutiny and potential policy changes aimed at curbing the influence of these dominant PBMs. The agency’s focus on market consolidation and its effects on drug prices signals a critical step towards addressing the growing concerns of consumers and smaller pharmacies struggling under the current system.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Big Tech Braces for Potential Changes Under a Second Trump Presidency
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
Trump’s Potential Shift in US Antitrust Policy Raises Questions for Big Tech and Mergers
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU Set to Fine Apple in First Major Enforcement of Digital Markets Act
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Six Indicted in Federal Bid-Rigging Schemes Involving Government IT Contracts
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Ireland Secures First €3 Billion Apple Tax Payment, Boosting Exchequer Funds
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI