McDonald’s has filed a lawsuit against several major beef suppliers, including industry giants Tyson Foods, JBS and Cargill, accusing them of conspiring to fix beef prices at artificially high levels. According to Politico, the lawsuit claims the suppliers colluded to inflate prices in a manner that violates federal antitrust laws, specifically targeting the Sherman Antitrust Act.
The suit, filed in the U.S. Eastern District of New York, alleges that the beef suppliers have been engaged in a price-fixing scheme since 2015, manipulating the market by reducing the supply of slaughter-ready cattle. This, in turn, artificially raised beef prices, harming McDonald’s and other buyers. According to McDonald’s, the companies’ actions resulted in “supracompetitive” price levels that substantially impacted the fast-food chain’s costs.
Per Politico, the defendants named in the suit account for around 80% of the U.S. beef market, selling more than 25 million pounds of beef in 2018. The complaint contends that their coordinated efforts to reduce beef supply, through tactics like plant closures and reduced slaughter volumes, forced prices higher, despite market conditions that would have otherwise led to lower costs.
This alleged scheme also allowed the companies to maintain exceptionally high profit margins, further raising suspicion. For instance, Tyson Foods reported an 18% operating margin in its beef business in 2021, nearly nine times what it had reported in 2014, according to the complaint. JBS USA also saw a significant jump, with net revenues climbing to $27.2 billion in 2021, a 25.8% increase from its 2014 figures.
Read more: US Appeals Court Revives Claims Of ‘No-Poaching’ Agreements Against McDonald’s
In its filing, McDonald’s is seeking triple the damages it sustained as a result of these inflated prices, along with attorneys’ fees and interest. The fast-food giant also wants the court to issue an injunction preventing the suppliers from engaging in similar price-fixing schemes in the future.
The legal battle stems from a broader investigation into the meat industry’s pricing practices. According to the lawsuit, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) subpoenaed some of these suppliers in 2020 as part of an inquiry into price manipulation in the beef market. A confidential witness from that investigation provided crucial information, revealing details of the alleged conspiracy among suppliers. Per the lawsuit, the companies allegedly communicated through phone calls to avoid leaving written evidence of their price-fixing activities.
McDonald’s claims the suppliers concealed their scheme by attributing their rising profits to their ability to predict cattle supplies. For instance, in a 2018 earnings call, Tyson Foods attributed its abnormally high operating margins to the company’s understanding of cattle availability, per the lawsuit.
Source: Politico
Featured News
Big Tech Braces for Potential Changes Under a Second Trump Presidency
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
Trump’s Potential Shift in US Antitrust Policy Raises Questions for Big Tech and Mergers
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU Set to Fine Apple in First Major Enforcement of Digital Markets Act
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Six Indicted in Federal Bid-Rigging Schemes Involving Government IT Contracts
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Ireland Secures First €3 Billion Apple Tax Payment, Boosting Exchequer Funds
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI