Apple Inc. has requested a federal judge in New Jersey to dismiss a high-profile antitrust lawsuit filed by U.S. federal and state regulators. According to Reuters, the lawsuit accuses Apple of monopolizing the smartphone market through restrictive practices. The company contends that the case represents an attempt to impose a “judicial redesign” of its iPhone technology.
The Justice Department, along with 19 states and Washington, D.C., has alleged that Apple engages in illegal monopolistic behavior by imposing contractual restrictions on developers and limiting their access to crucial technologies. In a motion submitted to the court in Newark, New Jersey, Apple argued that placing “reasonable limitations” on third-party developers does not constitute anti-competitive conduct.
Per Reuters, U.S. District Judge Julien Neals, who is overseeing the case, will review responses from both the government and Apple before making a decision on the motion later this year. Apple’s legal team highlighted in court that the company faces significant competition from global smartphone manufacturers, including Google and Samsung.
Read more: Apple Denies EU Competition Law Violation Ahead of Fine Decision
The filing also challenges the lawsuit’s claim that Apple’s actions have negatively impacted consumers. According to Apple, the complaint fails to demonstrate any substantial harm to consumers, a crucial element in antitrust cases. “It is implausible to claim, as the government does, that Apple has deterred any customers from switching to Google or Samsung due to its policies,” the company stated in its motion.
The lawsuit, filed in March, accuses Apple of obstructing rivals by restricting their access to hardware and software features on its devices. Antitrust enforcers allege that Apple has used its control over app distribution to stifle innovations that could make it easier for consumers to switch phones.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Big Tech Braces for Potential Changes Under a Second Trump Presidency
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
Trump’s Potential Shift in US Antitrust Policy Raises Questions for Big Tech and Mergers
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU Set to Fine Apple in First Major Enforcement of Digital Markets Act
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Six Indicted in Federal Bid-Rigging Schemes Involving Government IT Contracts
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Ireland Secures First €3 Billion Apple Tax Payment, Boosting Exchequer Funds
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI