By: Rohan Mehta (MIT Technology Review)
The release of ChatGPT has been a disruptive development for the world of higher education. Universities have scrambled to provide guidance to their staff and students, taking to social media to share a growing range of responses. Students, for their part, have been cautiously experimenting with ways to make AI play some part in their academic work.
Yet, the idea of calmly and carefully responding to this new and exciting tool seems to have entirely missed the world of basic education – the K-12 system, as is known in the USA – opting instead for broad bans and blocked websites.1
In the view of author Rohan Mehta, that’s a shame. If educators were to engage with students and embrace the technology’s capabilities, as well as understand its limitations, they could work together in defining new academic stasndards that would allow generative AI to democratize and revitalize elementary education…
Featured News
Belgian Authorities Detain Multiple Individuals Over Alleged Huawei Bribery in EU Parliament
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Grubhub’s Antitrust Case to Proceed in Federal Court, Second Circuit Rules
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Pharma Giants Mallinckrodt and Endo to Merge in Multi-Billion-Dollar Deal
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Targets Meta’s Market Power, Calls Zuckerberg to Testify
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
French Watchdog Approves Carrefour’s Expansion, Orders Store Sell-Off
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li