A PYMNTS Company

Chile: Competition court rejects abuse of dominance suit against Claro, Movistar and Entel

By  |  April 11, 2017

Chile’s competition tribunal, the TDLC, has rejected the suit pressed by Netline Mobile, OPS Ingeniería Limitada and Telecomunicaciones Max against Claro (América Móvil), Movistar (Telefónica) and Entel over their alleged use of uncompetitive practice, such as exclusion, price discrimination and abuse of dominance.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    In legal terms, the plaintiffs had argued that the three companies had failed to comply with the Supreme Court’s 2011 ruling, which forces the companies to present an offer of facilities and/or resale plans for smaller Virtual Mobile Operators. The companies are also accused of several violations of Article 3 of Decree 211, which applies to any who ”perform any action, event or convention which impedes, restricts of presents a burden to free competition.”

    The TDLC’s sentence makes clear that, based on the available evidence, all three companies did in fact fulfil their obligations to the Supreme Court, thus rejecting the plaintiff’s case. The court also indicated that “commercial conditions would have allowed the arrival of competitors as efficient as who has made the offer. This can not be considered margin squeezing.”
    Full Content: Telesemana

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.