By: Alfonso Miranda Londoño & Juan D. Gutiérrez-Rodríguez
Historically, the airline industry has been characterized by the heavy regulation established by the State. In effect, during the first six decades of the existence of these services in most of the developed countries, the governments applied a strict regulation in all the aspects of the service, a strong policy of subsidies and different entry barriers of legal origin that restricted the competition in the market. However, in the seventies the government of the United States deregulated the market, liberalizing the tariffs and allowing the market to work with more flexibility. Deregulation gave antitrust law and important role in regards to the promotion and preservation of competition in the market.
In Colombia the evolution of the regulation of the airline industry has followed a similar tendency. Since the year 1992 until the issuance of the Resolution 3299 of 2007, the intervention of the Special Administrative Unit of Civil Aeronautics (AEROCIVIL) over the aeronautic tariffs consisted on their approval for each route on a maximum-minimum price basis. The issuance of the Resolution 3299 of 2007 by the AEROCIVIL, that liberated the national and international tariffs of the regular air transport of passengers had an immediate effect of increasing the competition, reflected on the substantial decrease of tariffs and the entrance of new firms.
Taking into account this context, the purpose of the paper is to present in detail the special competition regime in the Colombian aeronautical sector. The document explains the faculties of the as the competition authority of the aeronautics sector and analyzes the commercial policies of airlines and travel agencies.
Full Content: SSRN
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Belgian Authorities Detain Multiple Individuals Over Alleged Huawei Bribery in EU Parliament
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Grubhub’s Antitrust Case to Proceed in Federal Court, Second Circuit Rules
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Pharma Giants Mallinckrodt and Endo to Merge in Multi-Billion-Dollar Deal
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Targets Meta’s Market Power, Calls Zuckerberg to Testify
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
French Watchdog Approves Carrefour’s Expansion, Orders Store Sell-Off
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li