Competition Buzz: The Foundations of Unfair Terms Regulation: An Alternative Economic Analysis
By: Roger Merino
The new Peruvian “Code of Protection and Defense of Consumers” has been blamed of “socialist” and “fascist” because it prohibits unfair terms. For the critics this regulation would be paternalistic and inefficient by limiting the consumers “right to choice.” These critiques are based on an orthodox economic analysis rooted in neoclassical economics on one hand, and Austrian economic on the other hand. The aim of this essay is to criticize the conservative critique by demonstrating that there are alternative economic movements that provide strong economic, social and ethic foundations for the regulation of unfair terms.
Full Content (in Spanish): SSRN
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Belgian Authorities Detain Multiple Individuals Over Alleged Huawei Bribery in EU Parliament
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Grubhub’s Antitrust Case to Proceed in Federal Court, Second Circuit Rules
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Pharma Giants Mallinckrodt and Endo to Merge in Multi-Billion-Dollar Deal
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Targets Meta’s Market Power, Calls Zuckerberg to Testify
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
French Watchdog Approves Carrefour’s Expansion, Orders Store Sell-Off
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li