Competition Buzz: Turnover as a Criterion for Setting Fines in Competition Law
Annual turnover is a key factor for adjusting the penalty that applies to companies that violate the Competition law. The higher the turnover of the offender, the greater the damage that his conduct may infringe to competition. In the EU “turnover in the market affected by the infringement” is a criterion that is used to set the basic amount of the fine, while the “global turnover of the infringing company” is employed to set a ceiling on the penalty. In Spain, the national competition authority has applied similar criteria to grade penalties. However, since March 2013, the High Court has launched a line of cases in which adopts a different methodology regarding turnover which has resulted, in practice, in a substantial reduction of fines. In this paper the author criticises the arguments that have led the High Court to adopt this interpretation sui generis of annual turnover. Furthermore, although its admissible the coexistence of two (national and European) sanctioning regimes for violation of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU, the author warns that this line of decisions may undermine the deterrent effect of the fines resulting from violation of the antitrust laws.
Full Content: SSRN
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Belgian Authorities Detain Multiple Individuals Over Alleged Huawei Bribery in EU Parliament
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Grubhub’s Antitrust Case to Proceed in Federal Court, Second Circuit Rules
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Pharma Giants Mallinckrodt and Endo to Merge in Multi-Billion-Dollar Deal
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Targets Meta’s Market Power, Calls Zuckerberg to Testify
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
French Watchdog Approves Carrefour’s Expansion, Orders Store Sell-Off
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li