
By: Julius Renz, Fiene Kuhlmann, Nick Frenken & Darius Walter (D’Kart)
On 26 May 2023, competition law was once again a topic in the German Bundestag: The Parliament held the first reading of the planned reform of the Act against Restraints of Competition (GWB). The Bundeskartellamt, the national competition agency, is to receive extended powers – we reported. This upcoming 11th amendment is an occasion to look back at the last debates in parliament. Four students of Heinrich Heine University have done just that: they have – in a project with Prof. Dr. Heiko Beyer – looked at the debates in the Bundestag in the 19th and 20th legislative periods from a sociological perspective...
Debates on Digital Capitalism
The challenges and concerns of digital capitalism are currently being grappled with by the general public. However, how do lawmakers evaluate the actions and dominant market positions of tech giants? To shed light on this, a discourse analysis was conducted, employing the sociological paradigm of the sociology of knowledge. This analysis focused on the speeches made during two Bundestag debates spanning a year, encompassing all parties represented in the 19th and 20th legislative periods. The findings offer an initial glimpse into how parliamentary parties perceive and appraise the emerging phenomenon of the platform economy, which is commonly referred to as “digital capitalism.” Interestingly, there is an observable trend of increasing deviation from the traditional ideologies of the parties, sometimes with significant disparities.
In this context, ideology pertains to the manner in which knowledge and thinking are shaped within a society. Here, ideologies manifest themselves through political parties, acting as the carriers of ideology. These parties adopt distinct perspectives on economic contexts and provide their evaluations accordingly. Consequently, different ideologically influenced explanations emerge regarding the same phenomenon, digital capitalism. The following outlines these varied ideological perspectives. It is important to note that ideologies are subject to change and adaptation over time, particularly within parliamentary democracies, where institutional pressures can lead to convergence within the party system…
Featured News
Belgian Authorities Detain Multiple Individuals Over Alleged Huawei Bribery in EU Parliament
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Grubhub’s Antitrust Case to Proceed in Federal Court, Second Circuit Rules
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Pharma Giants Mallinckrodt and Endo to Merge in Multi-Billion-Dollar Deal
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Targets Meta’s Market Power, Calls Zuckerberg to Testify
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
French Watchdog Approves Carrefour’s Expansion, Orders Store Sell-Off
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li