In a legal battle over the proposed merger between retail giants Kroger and Albertsons, the United States Justice Department has thrown its weight behind Colorado’s bid to thwart the $24.6 billion deal.
According to Bloomberg, Colorado initiated legal proceedings against the merger, contending that it would significantly harm competition in the grocery market. The state pursued its case independently from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and a coalition of eight other states plus Washington, DC, which are challenging the merger in federal court in Oregon.
Kroger and Albertsons attempted to dismiss Colorado’s lawsuit, arguing that the state lacked the authority to seek a nationwide injunction. However, the Justice Department, in a filing with the Denver district court, asserted that federal laws do not preclude states from pursuing their own antitrust cases, even if they seek different remedies than those pursued at the federal level.
“The federal antitrust laws do not preempt or otherwise preclude parallel state lawsuits to protect the public,” the Justice Department stated in its filing.
Related: Kroger-Albertsons Merger Could Give Walmart Shoppers A Low-Cost Grocery Alternative
The department cited recent antitrust lawsuits against tech giants Google and Meta Platforms Inc. as examples of states independently pursuing legal action, per Bloomberg.
However, Kroger’s legal representative, Matthew Wolf, criticized the Justice Department’s position, noting what he saw as a contradiction from a previous case involving T-Mobile USA Inc. and Sprint. In that instance, the Justice Department settled with the companies, but several states sued to block the merger.
In a comment to Bloomberg, Colorado’s lawyer, Conor May, clarified that the Justice Department’s stance in the T-Mobile case pertained to federal antitrust law, whereas the current dispute relies on Colorado’s state antitrust regulations.
Judge Andrew J. Luxen, presiding over the case, has yet to indicate when he might rule on Kroger and Albertsons’ motion to dismiss Colorado’s lawsuit. However, he has scheduled a hearing in August to consider the state’s request for a preliminary injunction against the merger, citing potential harm to residents.
Source: Bloomberg
Featured News
Big Tech Braces for Potential Changes Under a Second Trump Presidency
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
Trump’s Potential Shift in US Antitrust Policy Raises Questions for Big Tech and Mergers
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU Set to Fine Apple in First Major Enforcement of Digital Markets Act
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Six Indicted in Federal Bid-Rigging Schemes Involving Government IT Contracts
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Ireland Secures First €3 Billion Apple Tax Payment, Boosting Exchequer Funds
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI