By: Mariana Pargendler, Maria Luiza Mesquita & Lucas Víspico (Pro Market)
Competition regulators have historically directed their attention towards equity connections manifested through stock ownership and control as the defining parameters of a company concerning antitrust investigations. Our recent research document illustrates how competition authorities in several regions within the Global South, including Argentina, Brazil, Indonesia, and Turkey, have consistently turned to familial connections when delineating a business entity (or enterprise) during the course of regulatory actions.
Familial ownership stands as the predominant model of corporate ownership globally, particularly in emerging economies. Family-run enterprises often exhibit distinct operational behaviors in comparison to other business types. An ongoing study has unveiled that family-owned businesses in Italy encounter fewer instances of antitrust oversight. Family ownership demonstrates its efficacy in mitigating institutional deficiencies inherent in developing nations, such as inadequate contract enforcement and failures within capital markets. Simultaneously, family control could potentially facilitate corporate misconduct. A recently published working paper by Pablo Balán, Juan Dodyk, and Ignacio Puente from the Stigler Center proposes that familial connections might be employed to amplify corporate influence and navigate around regulations. The authors put forth evidence indicating that in response to a recent prohibition on corporate political contributions, individual members of controlling families in Brazilian companies have substituted corporate donations with personal ones.
Competition watchdogs in the Global South have acknowledged the economic significance of family bonds and their capacity to undermine the efficacy of antitrust legislation. These agencies have leaned on familial relationships as legal links to associate separate legal entities controlled by different members of the same family, especially during investigations into mergers and anticompetitive agreements…
Featured News
Big Tech Braces for Potential Changes Under a Second Trump Presidency
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
Trump’s Potential Shift in US Antitrust Policy Raises Questions for Big Tech and Mergers
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU Set to Fine Apple in First Major Enforcement of Digital Markets Act
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Six Indicted in Federal Bid-Rigging Schemes Involving Government IT Contracts
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Ireland Secures First €3 Billion Apple Tax Payment, Boosting Exchequer Funds
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI