By: A. J. Firstman (Findlaw)
The widespread use of artificial intelligence, including advanced language models like ChatGPT, has raised concerns across various professions. Educators, writers, and musicians are grappling with the impact on their fields, and now the legal profession is also taking notice.
U.S. District Judge Brantley Starr of the Northern District of Texas has implemented a unique requirement in his courtroom. Lawyers must now certify that they did not use AI to draft their filings unless human verification for accuracy occurred.
Judge Starr’s decision stems from concerns about AI platforms, such as ChatGPT, potentially fabricating details, citations, and even entire legal cases. While initially contemplating a complete ban on AI in the courtroom, he settled on a nuanced approach, restricting its use in legal briefing unless verified by human review…
Featured News
Big Tech Braces for Potential Changes Under a Second Trump Presidency
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
Trump’s Potential Shift in US Antitrust Policy Raises Questions for Big Tech and Mergers
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU Set to Fine Apple in First Major Enforcement of Digital Markets Act
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Six Indicted in Federal Bid-Rigging Schemes Involving Government IT Contracts
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Ireland Secures First €3 Billion Apple Tax Payment, Boosting Exchequer Funds
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI