
By: A. J. Firstman (Findlaw)
The widespread use of artificial intelligence, including advanced language models like ChatGPT, has raised concerns across various professions. Educators, writers, and musicians are grappling with the impact on their fields, and now the legal profession is also taking notice.
U.S. District Judge Brantley Starr of the Northern District of Texas has implemented a unique requirement in his courtroom. Lawyers must now certify that they did not use AI to draft their filings unless human verification for accuracy occurred.
Judge Starr’s decision stems from concerns about AI platforms, such as ChatGPT, potentially fabricating details, citations, and even entire legal cases. While initially contemplating a complete ban on AI in the courtroom, he settled on a nuanced approach, restricting its use in legal briefing unless verified by human review…
Featured News
Belgian Authorities Detain Multiple Individuals Over Alleged Huawei Bribery in EU Parliament
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Grubhub’s Antitrust Case to Proceed in Federal Court, Second Circuit Rules
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Pharma Giants Mallinckrodt and Endo to Merge in Multi-Billion-Dollar Deal
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Targets Meta’s Market Power, Calls Zuckerberg to Testify
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
French Watchdog Approves Carrefour’s Expansion, Orders Store Sell-Off
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li