FIFA, the global governing body for football, is facing increased scrutiny from the European Union’s (EU) antitrust regulators following a complaint lodged by several prominent European football organizations. According to DevDiscourse, these entities accuse FIFA of abusing its dominant position by expanding the international football schedule in a manner that could harm players and disrupt club operations.
The core of the complaint centers on the increased strain being placed on footballers due to the growing number of matches in the international calendar. This concern is amplified by the upcoming expansion of the FIFA Club World Cup, which is set to grow from seven to 32 teams, and will occupy nearly a month in the United States. European football entities argue that such expansions risk causing player fatigue and increasing injuries, as well as creating scheduling conflicts with club-level tournaments. The physical and mental well-being of players has been cited as a critical issue, with critics suggesting that FIFA is prioritizing commercial interests over the welfare of athletes.
Javier Tebas, the president of Spain’s LaLiga, has been particularly vocal in his criticism, accusing FIFA of acting out of self-interest and neglecting the broader implications of these decisions on the football ecosystem. Per DevDiscourse, Tebas and other European football leaders believe that the expanded tournament will not only impact players but also disrupt pre-season preparations for many clubs, potentially affecting their commercial activities, such as lucrative pre-season tours.
Related: Biden Administration Supports Antitrust Suit Against FIFA
FIFA, however, maintains that the expanded schedule was implemented after extensive consultations with stakeholders across the football world, including representatives from Europe. FIFA’s defense has been that the new calendar reflects a balanced approach to growing the sport while maintaining dialogue with global football organizations.
Interestingly, UEFA, the governing body for European football, is not part of the complaint despite the fact that it has also increased its own match schedule with the expansion of the Champions League. UEFA’s decision to stay out of the conflict is reportedly due to its ongoing discussions with European leagues, demonstrating a more cooperative approach to navigating the increasingly crowded football calendar.
As tensions between FIFA and European football organizations continue to escalate, the outcome of the antitrust investigation could have significant ramifications for the future of international football.
Source: DevDiscourse
Featured News
Big Tech Braces for Potential Changes Under a Second Trump Presidency
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
Trump’s Potential Shift in US Antitrust Policy Raises Questions for Big Tech and Mergers
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU Set to Fine Apple in First Major Enforcement of Digital Markets Act
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Six Indicted in Federal Bid-Rigging Schemes Involving Government IT Contracts
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Ireland Secures First €3 Billion Apple Tax Payment, Boosting Exchequer Funds
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI