Flipkart Sellers Sue Indian Antitrust Watchdog Over Competition Law Violation Findings
Three online sellers on Walmart-owned Flipkart have filed lawsuits against India’s antitrust authority, seeking to halt an investigation that found they, along with Flipkart and rival Amazon, breached competition laws. The lawsuits, seen in court filings and reported by Reuters, were submitted to the High Court of Karnataka in an attempt to block further legal action.
The legal move comes after an antitrust probe concluded in August, finding that Flipkart, Amazon, certain smartphone brands, and specific sellers violated Indian competition rules. According to Reuters, the investigation alleged that these companies provided undue preference to certain online sellers and gave priority to specific product listings, thus harming smaller businesses and competitors.
Flipkart, a leading e-commerce player in India and a direct competitor to Amazon, is now facing growing legal challenges from both sellers on its platform and regulators. The three sellers—CIGFIL Retail, Wishery Online, and Xonique Ventures—have argued that the antitrust inquiry conducted by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) was unjust. According to Reuters, the sellers claim they were initially asked to provide data to assist the investigation, only to later be named as accused parties without due process.
Read more: Xiaomi Requests CCI Retract Sensitive Report in Flipkart Antitrust Case
The sellers have criticized the investigation as being “arbitrary, opaque, and unfair,” per their court submissions, and are seeking to have the investigation report set aside. The lawsuits will likely be heard in court next week.
This antitrust investigation was initiated in 2020 following complaints from the Confederation of All India Traders, which represents brick-and-mortar retailers. They accused Amazon and Flipkart of exploiting their dominant positions in the market by favoring certain sellers and manipulating product listings. Both e-commerce giants have denied any wrongdoing.
If the lawsuits succeed, they could delay the overall investigation, which has already been closely watched by Indian regulators and the global e-commerce industry. The case is seen as a critical moment for how competition laws are enforced in India’s rapidly growing digital marketplace.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Big Tech Braces for Potential Changes Under a Second Trump Presidency
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
Trump’s Potential Shift in US Antitrust Policy Raises Questions for Big Tech and Mergers
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU Set to Fine Apple in First Major Enforcement of Digital Markets Act
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Six Indicted in Federal Bid-Rigging Schemes Involving Government IT Contracts
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Ireland Secures First €3 Billion Apple Tax Payment, Boosting Exchequer Funds
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI