FTC Intervenes in Teva’s Inhaler Litigation Against Amneal Amid Patent Crackdown
The Us Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has once again stepped into the fray, this time weighing in on the legal battle between Teva Pharmaceuticals and Amneal Pharmaceuticals over asthma inhaler patents.
The FTC’s involvement stems from its ongoing efforts to scrutinize and challenge drug patents it deems questionable, particularly those listed in the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Orange Book. This comprehensive catalog serves as a vital resource for generic drug developers, detailing branded drug patents. However, the FTC asserts that some of these patents are unjustifiably blocking competition, impeding the entry of more affordable generic alternatives.
In the latest development, the FTC filed an amicus brief in a New Jersey federal court, taking aim at Teva Pharmaceuticals for what it alleges are “improperly listed” patents related to its asthma inhaler, ProAir HFA. According to the FTC, Teva employed these patents to obstruct Amneal Pharmaceuticals’ efforts to secure approval for a generic version of the inhaler. Consequently, the FTC is urging the court to compel Teva to retract the five patents central to the dispute.
Read more: EU Regulator Claims Pharma Group Teva Delayed Generic Competition
The crux of the matter lies in the statutory stay triggered by Teva’s patent infringement claims, effectively halting Amneal’s generic ProAir inhaler’s approval for up to 30 months. This delay potentially postpones the approval of the generic drug until February 2026, a move that Amneal contends could have been avoided if not for what it perceives as Teva’s misuse of patents.
Amneal, aligning itself with the FTC’s stance, has accused Teva of “improper Orange Book listings,” arguing that the contested patents lacked validity and should not have warranted a stay of approval. According to Amneal, had Teva refrained from challenging its generic asthma medication based on these patents, FDA approval could have been secured as early as April 2024.
Now, with the support of the FTC, Amneal seeks a favorable judgment from the court, one that would compel Teva to remove the contentious ProAir patents from the Orange Book. Such a decision, the FTC contends, would pave the way for expedited approval of competing generic products, potentially enhancing market competition and accessibility to more affordable medications.
As the legal battle unfolds, the outcome could have far-reaching implications not only for Teva and Amneal but for the broader landscape of pharmaceutical patent enforcement and its impact on drug accessibility and affordability for consumers.
Source: Fierce Pharma
Featured News
Subscribers Defend $4.7 Billion Antitrust Verdict Against NFL in Court Filings
Jul 19, 2024 by
CPI
Von der Leyen Calls for Competition Policy to Boost EU Companies’ Growth
Jul 19, 2024 by
CPI
Vermont AG Sues Pharmacy Benefit Managers Over Drug Prices
Jul 18, 2024 by
CPI
Australians Face Increased Stamp Prices Following ACCC Approval
Jul 18, 2024 by
CPI
Live Nation Seeks Dismissal of DOJ Antitrust Allegations
Jul 18, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Private Equity Roll-Up Schemes
Jun 28, 2024 by
CPI
The FTC’s Focus on Private Equity is Warranted
Jun 28, 2024 by
CPI
Unraveling the Roll-Up: Private Equity’s Misunderstood Investment Strategy
Jun 28, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Focus on Private Equity Funds and Serial Acquisitions
Jun 28, 2024 by
CPI
Private Equity Roll-Ups Amidst Heightened Antitrust Enforcement
Jun 28, 2024 by
CPI