In an antitrust case against Google, economist Michael Whinston testified that in 2017, Google changed its advertising auction method, causing prices to rise by 15% and potentially earning the company billions in additional revenue.
Google’s auction system had winners pay just one cent more than the runner-up. In 2016, Google discovered that the runner-up often bid only 80% of the winner’s offer. To close this gap, Google gave the second-place bidder a built-in advantage to make their offer more competitive.
Related: Google Accuses India’s Competition Commission of Protecting Amazon
Whinston stated that Google’s ability to modify these rules illustrates its control over online advertising. The U.S. Department of Justice alleges that Google unlawfully maintains a monopoly over online search by paying web browsers and smartphone makers to make it the default option.
Search ads make up over 60% of Google’s total revenue, amounting to more than $100 billion in 2020. The case continues to unfold, with potentially significant implications for Google’s future in the advertising industry.
Source: Financial Express
Featured News
Big Tech Braces for Potential Changes Under a Second Trump Presidency
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
Trump’s Potential Shift in US Antitrust Policy Raises Questions for Big Tech and Mergers
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU Set to Fine Apple in First Major Enforcement of Digital Markets Act
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Six Indicted in Federal Bid-Rigging Schemes Involving Government IT Contracts
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Ireland Secures First €3 Billion Apple Tax Payment, Boosting Exchequer Funds
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI