By: Rachel Landy (CLS Blue Sky Blog)
For almost four decades, scholars have been debating whether business lawyers provide value to transactions. The discussion began with a significant article by Professor Ronald Gilson. In the article, Gilson referred to business lawyers as “transaction cost engineers.” He argued that these engineers optimize the cost of a transaction by helping contracting parties find efficient ways to resolve negotiation stalemates. This way, they create more valuable deals.
Gilson’s theory gave us important insights into sophisticated corporate law practice, where outside lawyers are hired to make unique deals happen. However, the current literature does not explain how many business lawyers, particularly startup lawyers, operate. Startup lawyers can control the cost of their client’s eventual exit (for example, an acquisition or an initial public offering (IPO)) well before that transaction takes place. By doing this, they can influence the value of the startup itself. These lawyers are not just transaction cost engineers; they are exit engineers…
Featured News
Big Tech Braces for Potential Changes Under a Second Trump Presidency
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
Trump’s Potential Shift in US Antitrust Policy Raises Questions for Big Tech and Mergers
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU Set to Fine Apple in First Major Enforcement of Digital Markets Act
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Six Indicted in Federal Bid-Rigging Schemes Involving Government IT Contracts
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Ireland Secures First €3 Billion Apple Tax Payment, Boosting Exchequer Funds
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI