In the Shadow of the European Court of Justice: The Luxembourg Conference on Transatlantic Data Transfers
By: Kenneth Propp (European Law Blog)
The EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (DPF), freshly in force, faces an early legal challenge at the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). On September 7, 2023, French parliamentarian Philippe Latombe initiated a direct action seeking annulment of the European Commission’s adequacy decision concerning the DPF. Mr. Latombe’s request for interim measures, aiming to halt DPF application, was rejected by the CJEU. However, several aspects of the case, including the question of standing, remain unaddressed.
Adding to the legal landscape, Austrian privacy activist Max Schrems, renowned for his role in invalidating two prior EU-U.S. data transfer agreements, has publicly declared his intent to challenge the DPF in the coming months. Schrems contemplates an indirect action in a Member State court, potentially in Austria, setting the stage for a preliminary reference to the CJEU. Thus, the unfolding chapters of the transatlantic privacy drama seem poised to play out in Luxembourg over the ensuing years.
Amidst these developments, the Max Planck Institute for Procedural Law (MPI) in Luxembourg, situated near the CJEU, convened a timely conference on September 15, 2023. The conference, hosted by the outgoing director, Professor Burkhard Hess, and co-organized by the author of this blog post, delved into the EU-U.S. agreement within the context of European fundamental rights and data protection law. This post provides an overview of the proceedings.
The conference brought together key negotiators of the accord, judicial officials, scholars in data protection and national security law, representatives from civil society, and legal practitioners. An unusual aspect was the participation of European and American national security officials responsible for data privacy oversight within their agencies. This post encapsulates the key insights gleaned from the discussions…
Featured News
Big Tech Braces for Potential Changes Under a Second Trump Presidency
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
Trump’s Potential Shift in US Antitrust Policy Raises Questions for Big Tech and Mergers
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU Set to Fine Apple in First Major Enforcement of Digital Markets Act
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Six Indicted in Federal Bid-Rigging Schemes Involving Government IT Contracts
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Ireland Secures First €3 Billion Apple Tax Payment, Boosting Exchequer Funds
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI