A federal judge has ruled that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) can proceed with its landmark antitrust lawsuit against Amazon, marking an early win for the agency in its ongoing efforts to challenge Big Tech’s market power. According to The Washington Post, U.S. District Judge John Chun dismissed some state-level claims but upheld the core federal allegations, allowing the case to advance.
The lawsuit, initially filed in September 2023 by the FTC, along with 18 states and Puerto Rico, accuses Amazon of monopolistic practices that harm both competitors and consumers. The FTC argues that the e-commerce giant used its dominance to squeeze merchants and drive up prices, diminishing the quality of goods available to American shoppers. According to the case, Amazon’s tactics suppress competition and limit consumer choice.
The Washington Post reported that while Judge Chun tossed some claims brought by state attorneys general, the federal antitrust accusations will continue. His ruling, delivered in a sealed order, is expected to be unsealed later in October. Despite this partial dismissal, the decision is seen as a setback for Amazon, which had hoped to have the entire case thrown out.
Amazon, however, maintains that its business model is beneficial to consumers. The company’s legal team argued in December 2023 that Amazon’s prices are competitive and aligned with industry standards. Nonetheless, the FTC’s case underscores broader concerns about the power of major tech companies and their influence on the economy.
Related: Federal Judge Partially Dismisses FTC’s Antitrust Case Against Amazon
The case is part of a wider regulatory push against Big Tech, with the FTC challenging Amazon and Meta, while the Department of Justice takes on Google and Apple. These cases test whether current antitrust laws, originally designed for traditional industries, can be applied to today’s digital marketplaces.
For Lina Khan, the FTC chair who rose to prominence for her critical analysis of Amazon’s market power in her 2017 law school paper, this case is particularly significant. Khan has become a leading figure in the “hipster antitrust” movement, which advocates for a more aggressive approach to regulating monopolistic behavior in the tech industry.
Source: The Washington Post
Featured News
Big Tech Braces for Potential Changes Under a Second Trump Presidency
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
Trump’s Potential Shift in US Antitrust Policy Raises Questions for Big Tech and Mergers
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU Set to Fine Apple in First Major Enforcement of Digital Markets Act
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Six Indicted in Federal Bid-Rigging Schemes Involving Government IT Contracts
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Ireland Secures First €3 Billion Apple Tax Payment, Boosting Exchequer Funds
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI