Trade organizations from the hospital, insurance and financial services sectors are actively challenging the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) proposed ban on noncompete agreements, highlighting a significant split within the judiciary over the regulator’s authority, according to Bloomberg.
The American Hospital Association and the Federation of American Hospitals, which collectively represent thousands of U.S. hospitals and health systems, submitted a brief on Monday to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. This brief opposes the FTC’s rule, which aims to ban noncompete clauses in employment contracts.
In addition, the American Property Casualty Insurance Association also filed a brief in the same Texas court, urging a ruling against the FTC. Meanwhile, groups such as the American Investment Council and the Managed Funds Association have backed a separate challenge to the regulation by filing a brief on July 24 in the Middle District of Florida.
Per Bloomberg, many of these groups argue that the FTC does not possess the statutory authority to enforce such a rule. They contend that noncompete agreements are essential for protecting investments in employee training and maintaining the confidentiality of proprietary information.
The hospital associations further highlighted the unique challenges faced by their sector, noting that the majority of hospitals are nonprofits. They asserted that the FTC does not have the statutory power to apply the noncompete rule to nonprofit hospitals, potentially creating an “uneven playing field” in the healthcare labor market.
This concerted push from various industry sectors comes as courts across the United States are considering multiple lawsuits against the FTC’s rule. The regulation, if implemented, would largely prohibit businesses from using noncompete contracts that restrict an employee’s ability to change jobs.
Recently, Judge Kelley Brisbon Hodge of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania ruled in favor of the FTC’s authority to issue the noncompete rule, denying a challenger’s request for a preliminary injunction on July 23. In contrast, Texas Judge Ada Brown granted a preliminary injunction to a tax firm and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, expressing skepticism about the FTC’s powers. Judge Brown indicated she would issue a final ruling by August 30, just before the FTC rule is set to take effect. Plaintiffs in the Texas case are also seeking a nationwide injunction.
The judge in Florida has yet to decide on a motion for a preliminary injunction filed by a real estate firm.
According to an FTC estimate, approximately 30 million Americans, or one in five workers, are currently bound by noncompete agreements.
Source: Bloomberg
Featured News
Big Tech Braces for Potential Changes Under a Second Trump Presidency
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
Trump’s Potential Shift in US Antitrust Policy Raises Questions for Big Tech and Mergers
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU Set to Fine Apple in First Major Enforcement of Digital Markets Act
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Six Indicted in Federal Bid-Rigging Schemes Involving Government IT Contracts
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Ireland Secures First €3 Billion Apple Tax Payment, Boosting Exchequer Funds
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI