A group of certified nurse assistant (CNA) training providers in Minnesota has filed a lawsuit challenging the legality of the state’s COVID-era initiative to offer free and competing CNA services. The lawsuit, filed on Thursday in a Minnesota federal court, alleges that the state’s program constitutes unlawful price-fixing, violating U.S. antitrust laws.
Twin Cities Safety, operating under the name HeartCert, along with other plaintiffs, argue that the state’s free CNA training initiative has had a detrimental impact on their businesses. The lawsuit claims that the state’s efforts, facilitated through various grant agreements, have created an uneven playing field, making it impossible for private training providers to compete with a government-sponsored program that offers the same training at no cost, reported Reuters.
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz announced the initiative in late 2021 as a response to the staffing shortages faced by long-term care facilities. The state aimed to recruit and train more nursing assistants, surpassing its goal of 1,000 recruits. Governor Walz commended the collaboration between the state, universities, and private training providers.
However, the lawsuit argues that the free program has led potential students to favor the state-sponsored option over private training services, resulting in significant economic harm to the plaintiffs and other CNA training providers. The complaint asserts that students are unwilling to pay for CNA training when they can access similar services for free at high schools or colleges participating in the state’s initiative.
Doug Anderson, a spokesperson for Minnesota’s state higher education system, defended the state’s program, stating, “We are proud of the important work that has been done through the Next Generation Nursing Assistant training program to address the critical shortage of Certified Nursing Assistants in Minnesota, and we are confident we will prevail in this litigation.”
The lawsuit challenges the notion that public governments are shielded from antitrust liability, arguing that Minnesota is not immune because its programs were not “affirmatively expressed as state policy.” The plaintiffs seek an injunction to halt Minnesota’s CNA training program, which covers the costs of tuition, books, materials, and a certification exam.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Big Tech Braces for Potential Changes Under a Second Trump Presidency
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
Trump’s Potential Shift in US Antitrust Policy Raises Questions for Big Tech and Mergers
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU Set to Fine Apple in First Major Enforcement of Digital Markets Act
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Six Indicted in Federal Bid-Rigging Schemes Involving Government IT Contracts
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Ireland Secures First €3 Billion Apple Tax Payment, Boosting Exchequer Funds
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI