MLB Players’ Union Backs Minor League Teams in Supreme Court Antitrust Challenge
Professional baseball’s player’s union has thrown its support behind a coalition of minor league teams seeking to challenge Major League Baseball’s long-standing immunity from US antitrust law.
On Tuesday, the union submitted a friend of the court brief in support of two minor league teams who are petitioning the US Supreme Court to overturn a century-old exemption in federal competition law that has protected MLB from legal liabilities.
The case currently before the Supreme Court aims to reverse a series of historical rulings, starting in 1922, that have designated baseball games as “purely state affairs” and thus outside the scope of U.S. competition law. As of now, the Supreme Court has not confirmed whether it will hear this dispute, per Reuters.
Lawyers representing the players union raised the question of why baseball, among all industries, remains immune to the law’s scrutiny. They noted that practitioners, academics, and those impacted by the sport’s anti-competitive practices are curious about this unique status.
Virginia Seitz, a lawyer for the players’ union from Sidley Austin, directed inquiries for comments to the union. However, a union representative had not provided an immediate response to requests for comment as of Wednesday.
Read more: MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred Defends Antitrust Exemption
The minor league baseball teams involved in the case, the Tri-City ValleyCats located in Troy, New York, and the Norwich Sea Unicorns based in Connecticut, took their appeal to the Supreme Court in September. They sought to revive a lawsuit originally filed against Major League Baseball in 2021. Their legal action stemmed from a reorganization by MLB, which led to the disaffiliation of approximately 40 minor league teams from major league clubs and imposed a cap on the number of affiliates at four.
In June, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld an order dismissing the lawsuit, citing the necessity of continuing to apply Supreme Court precedent until a new decision is made by the higher court.
The players’ union, which represents approximately 1,200 professional players and 5,500 minor leaguers, had not previously been involved in this legal battle.
The union’s brief asserted that MLB and its affiliated clubs should not be permitted to engage in further franchise contraction, which could result in the elimination of teams and jobs, without considering the potential anti-competitive consequences.
The 1998 federal Curt Flood Act established that, unlike other activities within Major League Baseball, employment matters concerning big league players are not exempt from U.S. antitrust law.
Source: Nasdaq
Featured News
Subscribers Defend $4.7 Billion Antitrust Verdict Against NFL in Court Filings
Jul 19, 2024 by
CPI
Von der Leyen Calls for Competition Policy to Boost EU Companies’ Growth
Jul 19, 2024 by
CPI
Vermont AG Sues Pharmacy Benefit Managers Over Drug Prices
Jul 18, 2024 by
CPI
Australians Face Increased Stamp Prices Following ACCC Approval
Jul 18, 2024 by
CPI
Live Nation Seeks Dismissal of DOJ Antitrust Allegations
Jul 18, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Private Equity Roll-Up Schemes
Jun 28, 2024 by
CPI
The FTC’s Focus on Private Equity is Warranted
Jun 28, 2024 by
CPI
Unraveling the Roll-Up: Private Equity’s Misunderstood Investment Strategy
Jun 28, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Focus on Private Equity Funds and Serial Acquisitions
Jun 28, 2024 by
CPI
Private Equity Roll-Ups Amidst Heightened Antitrust Enforcement
Jun 28, 2024 by
CPI