A PYMNTS Company

New DOJ Antitrust Postal Whistleblower Rewards Program: A Look Under the Shiny Hood

 |  July 21, 2025

By: Ann O’Brien & T. J. Benedict (Sheppard Mullin)

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    In his blog post for Sheppard Mullin’s Antitrust Law Blog, authors Ann O’Brien & T. J. Benedict take a look at the DOJ Antitrust Division’s newly announced Antitrust Whistleblower Rewards Program, unveiled on July 8. This first-of-its-kind initiative aims to reward individuals who provide original information leading to criminal fines or recoveries exceeding $1 million. Whistleblowers may receive between 15% and 30% of those recoveries. The DOJ will administer the program in collaboration with the U.S. Postal Inspection Service (USPIS) and the U.S. Postal Service Office of Inspector General (USPS OIG).

    However, the blog highlights that the program’s scope is narrower than initially suggested. According to the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), payments are only available if the whistleblower’s information relates to violations that affect the U.S. Postal Service—because it is the Postal Service, not the DOJ, that has statutory authority to pay informants. Additional eligibility restrictions include the requirement that information must be original, non-public, and not previously known to the authorities. Whistleblowers who obtained the information through attorney-client relationships, compliance roles, or illegal means are also disqualified.

    Further restrictions exclude individuals who led or coerced others into illegal conduct, and anyone affiliated with law enforcement or the Postal Service—including their relatives. The program also subjects submissions to a discretionary, multi-agency review process to determine both eligibility and payment amounts. Despite its limits, the program marks a significant shift for the Antitrust Division, which has traditionally relied on corporate leniency rather than financial incentives to uncover misconduct. It signals a broader move toward encouraging external whistleblowing as a complementary enforcement tool…

    CONTINUE READING…