A PYMNTS Company

Senators Ask USPTO & US Copyright Office To Conduct NFT Study, With A Focus On IP Issues

By  |  July 21, 2022

By: Caroline Rimmer (Blockchain and The Law)

UPDATE: On July 8, 2022,  the USPTO and the Copyright Office responded to the Senators’ letter and indicated that they would conduct a joint study on the current and potential future applications of NFTs and their respective IP-related challenges.

With a market capitalization forecast of over $35 billion for 2022, there is no question that non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are hugely popular. Despite this, the intellectual property rubric underlying these NFT offerings are inconsistent, confusing, and in many cases in conflict with applicable law. These issues apparently came to the attention of Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont, who, in a June 9, 2022 letter (as per their roles as the Ranking Member and Chairman of the Judiciary Subcommittee on Intellectual Property), requested that the USPTO and the Copyright Office undertake a joint study that addresses a number of IP legal issues around NFTs. Citing those roles and their broader interest in the “continued development and use of emerging technologies,” the Senators requested that the study address the following non-exclusive list of questions:

  • What are the current applications of NFTs and their respective IP and IP-related challenges?
  • What potential future applications of NFTs do you foresee and what are their respective potential IP challenges?
  • For current and potential future applications of NFTs:
    • How do transfers of rights apply? How does the transfer of an NFT impact the IP rights in the associated asset?
    • How do licensing rights apply? Can and how can IP rights in the associated asset be licensed in an NFT context?
    • In what way does infringement apply? What is the potential infringement analysis where an NFT is associated with an asset covered by third party IP? Or where the underlying asset associated with an NFT is owned by the NFT creator and infringed by another?
    • What intellectual property protection can be afforded? What IP protection can be afforded to the NFT creator? What if the NFT creator is a different person or entity from the creator of the associated asset?
    • How else does 17 U.S.C. § 106 apply?

CONTINUE READING…