Sysco Corp. must adhere to a global settlement in meat price-fixing lawsuits despite objections from litigation funder Burford Capital, according to Bloomberg. On Friday, an Illinois federal judge determined that Sysco’s acceptance of a settlement deal with beef, pork and chicken producers is enforceable.
Judge Thomas M. Durkin ruled that although Sysco did not formally sign the agreement, the company had agreed to the fundamental aspects of the settlement through email communications and draft documents. “That is sufficient objective evidence of an agreement to enforce it,” Durkin wrote in his decision.
This ruling adds another layer to the ongoing legal battle involving Burford, Sysco and the meat producers accused of conspiring to inflate meat prices. Burford had provided Sysco with $140 million to pursue these antitrust cases. However, disputes arose last year when Burford judged the settlement amount as insufficient. Subsequently, Sysco agreed to transfer its claims to a Burford affiliate, a move opposed by other parties involved in the litigation, reported Bloomberg.
Read more: Judge Blocks Sysco’s Bid to Assign Price-Fixing Claims to Burford Capital
“It is concerning that the court has today opted to enforce a supposed agreement that the parties clearly never viewed as binding,” Burford spokesman David Helfenbein expressed in an email statement. “We think corporate America will be surprised to learn that emails from mid-level corporate functionaries can be sufficient to bind companies to substantial settlements in the absence of executed settlement agreements.”
In March, Durkin permitted Sysco to transfer its chicken price-fixing claims to Burford. However, earlier this month, a Minnesota federal judge denied a similar substitution concerning related beef and pork price-fixing cases.
In his Friday ruling, Durkin upheld a motion by Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, one of the chicken producers sued for price-fixing, to enforce the global settlement that encompasses the poultry, beef and pork cases.
Source: News Bloomberg Law
Featured News
Big Tech Braces for Potential Changes Under a Second Trump Presidency
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
Trump’s Potential Shift in US Antitrust Policy Raises Questions for Big Tech and Mergers
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU Set to Fine Apple in First Major Enforcement of Digital Markets Act
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Six Indicted in Federal Bid-Rigging Schemes Involving Government IT Contracts
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Ireland Secures First €3 Billion Apple Tax Payment, Boosting Exchequer Funds
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI