
By: David Dayen (The American Prospect)
On the afternoon of last Friday, the Antitrust Division of the Justice Department reached a settlement in a merger dispute involving two of the three major companies in the residential door locks and digital security equipment market. The settlement permits Assa Abloy, a company known for its acquisitions, to acquire Spectrum, one of its two competitors, for a total of $4.4 billion. The agreement includes limited divestments to Fortune Brands, penalties for delayed divestiture, and the appointment of a trustee to ensure compliance.
This outcome raises some questions. Jonathan Kanter, the head of the Antitrust Division, has previously expressed a lack of interest in “behavioral remedies,” which involve approving mergers with conditions. In January 2022, Kanter stated to the New York State Bar Association that complex settlements, whether behavioral or structural, suffer from significant shortcomings. He emphasized a preference for seeking straightforward injunctions to block transactions when the division determines that a merger is likely to harm competition.
Interestingly, in this particular case, Kanter did attempt to block the transaction, and the trial had been ongoing for several weeks. However, the Antitrust Division unexpectedly reversed its position and agreed to a settlement that closely resembled Assa Abloy’s initial offer. This sudden change raises questions about the reasoning behind the decision…
Featured News
Belgian Authorities Detain Multiple Individuals Over Alleged Huawei Bribery in EU Parliament
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Grubhub’s Antitrust Case to Proceed in Federal Court, Second Circuit Rules
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Pharma Giants Mallinckrodt and Endo to Merge in Multi-Billion-Dollar Deal
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Targets Meta’s Market Power, Calls Zuckerberg to Testify
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
French Watchdog Approves Carrefour’s Expansion, Orders Store Sell-Off
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li