In a recent development, the Justice Department has removed a collection of documents related to Google’s high-profile antitrust trial from public access. This action followed a complaint from Google to the court regarding the release of certain documents.
Throughout the trial’s first week, the DOJ’s antitrust team had been posting trial exhibits on a publicly accessible website. These exhibits included emails, charts, and other internal documents that were submitted as evidence. The dispute arose on Tuesday when Google raised concerns about a specific document included as a trial exhibit, reported Bloomberg.
This move to take down the documents has limited public visibility into what is being deemed as one of the most significant antitrust trials in over two decades. The trial has previously restricted public access when discussing confidential internal company information.
Related: DOJ Claims Google Monopoly Delayed Innovation: Bloomberg
One such instance involved the submission of notes authored by Google’s Vice President of Finance, Michael Roszak, during a July 2017 training session. In these notes, Roszak reportedly mentioned that the company could “ignore demand and focus on supply.” Google contested the publication of this document online, arguing its irrelevance to the proceedings.
Google’s attorney, John Schmidtlein, highlighted the importance of the documents’ public posting, saying, “Just so we understand what’s at stake here, every document they push into evidence they post on their website, and it gets picked up far and wide. This isn’t a business record, and it’s totally irrelevant to these proceedings.”
Judge Amit Mehta, who presides over the case, expressed surprise at the practice and stated, “That’s something I wish I’d been told. I think a judge is told before evidence in the record is actually put on a publicly available website.”
Source: Bloomberg
Featured News
Big Tech Braces for Potential Changes Under a Second Trump Presidency
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
Trump’s Potential Shift in US Antitrust Policy Raises Questions for Big Tech and Mergers
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU Set to Fine Apple in First Major Enforcement of Digital Markets Act
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Six Indicted in Federal Bid-Rigging Schemes Involving Government IT Contracts
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Ireland Secures First €3 Billion Apple Tax Payment, Boosting Exchequer Funds
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI