
By: Joseph Boyer (Dublin City University Law & Tech Research Cluster)
Picture a world where algorithms, not people, decide your financial future. This is already happening in some countries, where algorithmic lending offers the promise of efficiency but also raises serious concerns about fairness and discrimination.
While algorithmic lending can improve access to credit and streamline the process, it also introduces significant risks. Biased algorithms, trained on historical data, can reinforce existing social inequalities, leading to unfair treatment and fewer opportunities for marginalized groups. Research has shown that certain racial and gender groups are often disproportionately denied loans as a result.
This post draws from Joseph Boyer’s master’s dissertation, “Algorithmic Creditworthiness: A Legal Dissection,” which thoroughly explores the effectiveness of legal frameworks in tackling algorithmic bias in AI-driven lending…
Featured News
Belgian Authorities Detain Multiple Individuals Over Alleged Huawei Bribery in EU Parliament
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Grubhub’s Antitrust Case to Proceed in Federal Court, Second Circuit Rules
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Pharma Giants Mallinckrodt and Endo to Merge in Multi-Billion-Dollar Deal
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Targets Meta’s Market Power, Calls Zuckerberg to Testify
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
French Watchdog Approves Carrefour’s Expansion, Orders Store Sell-Off
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li