In the ongoing federal antitrust lawsuit against Alphabet’s Google by the state of Texas, US District Judge Sean Jordan has appointed David Moran, a trial lawyer from the law firm Jackson Walker, as a “special master” to assist in resolving disputes over evidence.
The move, made on Friday, aims to streamline proceedings in the Plano, Texas case, as Moran, a seasoned trial lawyer, takes on the role of a court-appointed neutral party to facilitate the resolution of evidence-related issues.
Despite opposition from Google’s legal team, who argued against the appointment of a special master, Judge Jordan supported the suggestion, asserting that it would contribute to the efficient progression of the case. Google contended that there was no immediate need for such an appointment and that it could potentially lead to the creation and litigation of discovery issues.
Read more: Google’s US Ad Antitrust Suit Trial Date Set For March 2024
David Moran’s selection holds significance as he and Judge Jordan were former partners at the Texas-based Jackson Walker law firm. Having previously collaborated on cases at the 500-attorney firm, their professional history brings a familiarity to the dynamics of the legal proceedings.
Moran’s compensation for his role as a special master will be divided between Google and the state of Texas at his standard hourly rate, the exact details of which have not been disclosed. In similar cases, partners at Jackson Walker have been known to bill between $800 and $1,075 per hour.
While it is common for former judges to serve as special masters, Jordan’s proposal of Moran underscores their previous successful partnership and adds a unique dimension to the resolution process. As the case unfolds, the appointment of David Moran is expected to play a crucial role in addressing evidence-related disputes in the Google antitrust lawsuit.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Big Tech Braces for Potential Changes Under a Second Trump Presidency
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
Trump’s Potential Shift in US Antitrust Policy Raises Questions for Big Tech and Mergers
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU Set to Fine Apple in First Major Enforcement of Digital Markets Act
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Six Indicted in Federal Bid-Rigging Schemes Involving Government IT Contracts
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Ireland Secures First €3 Billion Apple Tax Payment, Boosting Exchequer Funds
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI