In this article, I use my recent opinion in Epic Games v. Apple to illustrate my approach as an appellate judge to reviewing economic evidence in Rule of Reason cases. Specifically, I highlight that opinion’s Rule of Reason step-three analysis as reflecting the “two-fold” deference that characterizes my review of economic evidence in such cases: that is, deference to the factual findings made below (procedural deference), and deference to a defendant’s choices regarding how to best str
...THIS ARTICLE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR IP ADDRESS 3.144.96.92
Please verify email or join us to access premium content!