The Court of Appeal in London ruled on Wednesday that Britain’s antitrust regulator, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), can compel companies based outside the United Kingdom to provide information. This ruling comes as a result of a case initiated by German carmakers BMW and Volkswagen, challenging the CMA’s authority to request documents and information for an investigation into alleged anti-competitive conduct in the recycling of old or written-off vehicles.
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG (BMW), the ultimate parent company of the BMW group, faced a fine of £30,000 ($37,991) in December 2022, with an additional daily penalty of £15,000, for failing to comply with the CMA’s information requests related to the recycling investigation. The Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) overturned this fine last year, asserting that the CMA lacked the power to demand information held outside the UK from companies situated beyond its jurisdiction. Volkswagen’s legal challenge to a CMA request for information was also successful in the CAT.
Read more: UK’s CMA Increasingly Hostile to Business, Says INEOS Chair
However, the Court of Appeal has now reversed the CAT’s decision, emphasizing the critical need for the CMA to have the authority to request information from companies located outside the UK. The court argued that without such power, there would be “a gaping lacuna” in the CMA’s ability to investigate and address anti-competitive practices that could harm the United Kingdom market.
The ruling highlighted the potential for a perverse incentive if the CMA could not extend its reach to overseas companies. It suggested that such a limitation would create an environment in which conspirators might relocate offshore to organize cartels specifically aimed at harming the UK market, rendering them nearly immune from investigation.
“The absence of such a power would create a perverse incentive for conspirators to move offshore to organise cartels directed at harming the United Kingdom market, and they would be more or less immune from investigation,” the court stated in its written ruling.
This decision is expected to have far-reaching implications, reinforcing the CMA’s ability to investigate and address anti-competitive behavior, even when involving companies headquartered outside the UK.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Big Tech Braces for Potential Changes Under a Second Trump Presidency
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
Trump’s Potential Shift in US Antitrust Policy Raises Questions for Big Tech and Mergers
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU Set to Fine Apple in First Major Enforcement of Digital Markets Act
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Six Indicted in Federal Bid-Rigging Schemes Involving Government IT Contracts
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Ireland Secures First €3 Billion Apple Tax Payment, Boosting Exchequer Funds
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI