The ride-sharing multinational Uber and Uruguay’s local governments, in their attempt to stop or regulate the company’s services, seem to have hit a standstill in their negotiations. In the meantime, the ride-sharing app has continued to operate within the country, with different possible solutions proposed.
The company sent authorities in the Montevideo and Canelones departments a letter, in which Uber invited the city heads to enter a “space for dialogue”. Uber has said it is willing to find a suitable regulatory framework, which would allow these departments to have ”better alternatives for mobility.” The reply however was the same as last November’s attempt: There can be no negotiations unless Uber stops its opperations. The company has rejected this compromise, defending the legality of their service and offering to support drivers who receive a fine.
Uruguay’s Chamber for Industry and Technology have criticised current law projects which seek to regulate Uber and other similar services, as they consider it may remove the incentive for technological innovation. The Commission for the Promotion and Defense of Competition, part of the Ministry of the Economy, has said the project making the rounds would be redundant, as both state and local governments already have the ability to regulate Uber’s business.
Full Content: El Observador
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Belgian Authorities Detain Multiple Individuals Over Alleged Huawei Bribery in EU Parliament
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Grubhub’s Antitrust Case to Proceed in Federal Court, Second Circuit Rules
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Pharma Giants Mallinckrodt and Endo to Merge in Multi-Billion-Dollar Deal
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Targets Meta’s Market Power, Calls Zuckerberg to Testify
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
French Watchdog Approves Carrefour’s Expansion, Orders Store Sell-Off
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li