In a dramatic escalation of tensions between Indian startups and tech giant Alphabet Google, a group representing Indian startups has formally petitioned the country’s antitrust watchdog to intervene in the recent removal of over 100 Indian apps from the Google Play Store. The move comes as a response to Google’s enforcement of its policy requiring apps to pay a service fee for in-app purchases made through platforms other than Google’s.
According to a letter seen by Reuters, the Alliance of Digital India Foundation (ADIF) has urged the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to order Google to reinstate the removed apps, citing concerns of anti-competitive behavior. Google’s action, described by ADIF as a “brazen move,” has sparked fears of irreparable damage to the Indian market.
The dispute stems from Google’s decision on Friday to remove a slew of Indian apps, including popular ones offered by Matrimony.com, for non-compliance with its policy on in-app payments. This move has drawn the ire of Indian startups, which have long accused Google of monopolistic practices. The startups argue that Google’s policy violates a 2022 antitrust directive aimed at preventing the tech giant from taking punitive measures against companies that utilize alternate billing systems.
Read more: Google Accuses India’s Competition Commission of Protecting Amazon
In its letter to the CCI dated March 1, ADIF asserted that Google’s actions were not only anti-competitive but also detrimental to the entire market. The letter, though not public, emphasized the urgency of the situation and called for swift action to address what it perceives as an unjustifiable assault on the Indian app ecosystem.
Google, for its part, has staunchly defended its policies, arguing that its in-app fee is crucial for the development and promotion of the Android and Play Store ecosystem. The company insists that it is in compliance with relevant regulations and denies any wrongdoing.
Featured News
Big Tech Braces for Potential Changes Under a Second Trump Presidency
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
Trump’s Potential Shift in US Antitrust Policy Raises Questions for Big Tech and Mergers
Nov 6, 2024 by
CPI
EU Set to Fine Apple in First Major Enforcement of Digital Markets Act
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Six Indicted in Federal Bid-Rigging Schemes Involving Government IT Contracts
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Ireland Secures First €3 Billion Apple Tax Payment, Boosting Exchequer Funds
Nov 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI