In reply to Neal Palmquist.

You are right. I didn't say that exactly right. What I meant was that the people who don't have a strong opinion either way about Bitcoin will "buy" the confirmation bias argument about us Bitcoin advocates (and that's correct), but not about you anti-Bitcoiners.

And I think you anti-Bicoiners are more biased because you come up with weaker evidence, like "it's too volatile" and then we agree and tell you about 200 different successful companies and technologies that were volatile in the beginning. So you say "there are no advantages, credit cards work fine." And we say "you're right when it comes to developed countries, but there are billions without banks and westerners that don't trust the current monetary system.."

My point is that your arguments are either narrow in scope and will be overcome with time and adoption, or they just plain don't apply at all.