Mastercard Buys BVNK in $1.8 Billion Bet on Stablecoin Settlement

There’s a fundamental flaw in how many observers view the stablecoin boom.

There’s an assumption that the ability of stablecoins to improve settlement is equivalent to replacing the payments experience. The logic, after all, appears straightforward: if stablecoins enable faster, cheaper, always-on settlement, why would anyone need cards?

But that would be a category-level error to make, as evidenced by Mastercard’s $1.8 billion acquisition of cryptocurrency infrastructure platform BVNK, announced on Tuesday (March 17).

In payments, as in much of finance, the layer closest to the customer tends to capture the value. And far from positioning stablecoins as a substitute for cards, Mastercard is explicitly framing them as complementary.

“We expect that most financial institutions and fintechs will in time provide digital currency services, be it with stablecoins or tokenized deposits. We want to support them and their customers with a best in class, highly compliant, interoperable offering that brings the benefits of tokenized money to the real world,” Mastercard Chief Product Officer Jorn Lambert said in the announcement, stressing that the BVNK acquisition is designed to extend the company’s payment network, not circumvent it.

BVNK’s core capability is to bridge fiat and blockchain systems, enabling businesses to move funds across both environments in more than 130 countries. Mastercard’s strategy is to plug that functionality into its existing network, creating a unified system supporting transactions and settlement across traditional and on-chain commerce experiences.

Read also: Can Crypto’s Open Network Dreams Survive Going Corporate?

The Enduring Power of Acceptance and Trust

If cost alone determined winners in payments, cards would have been displaced long ago. Instead, their dominance persists because of network effects. Cards solved the hardest problem in payments decades ago, which was creating a universal consumer interface wrapped in regulation, fraud protection and global acceptance.

Stablecoins, by contrast, optimize how money moves once a transaction is already initiated. They are, in effect, a better settlement engine. But better plumbing does not automatically replace the faucet.

Crucially for Mastercard’s acquisition and stablecoin products, the familiar branded and compliant card network interface remains intact. Stablecoins become another rail within the network’s ecosystem, alongside cards, bank transfers and other payment methods.

Still, stablecoins, for all their technical advantages, face a fragmented acceptance landscape. While they are gaining traction in specific use cases like cross-border remittances, business payments and digital asset transfers, they are not yet a universal medium of exchange in everyday commerce.

Mastercard’s strategy of embracing the new rails, integrating them into the existing system and continuing to own the interface could be what the stablecoin sector needs to scale beyond its own inherent limitations.

The company isn’t alone in its stablecoin ambitions. In December, Visa announced the launch of its Stablecoins Advisory Practice that serves banks, FinTechs, merchants and businesses of all sizes. Visa also partnered with the Stripe-owned BVNK competitor Bridge this month (March 3) and expanded its cross-border stablecoin capabilities.

The rise of stablecoins, it increasingly appears, may not mark the end of card networks but could mark their next evolution.

See also: Behind the Stablecoin Buzz, Old-School Infrastructure Still Runs the Show

A Hybrid Future

What Mastercard’s BVNK acquisition ultimately reveals is a shift in how the industry thinks about competition. The future of payments is not a binary choice between cards and stablecoins. It is a hybrid system in which different rails serve different functions.

Cards remain the dominant interface, capturing value through trust, acceptance, and user experience. Stablecoins enhance the underlying infrastructure, improving speed, cost and flexibility in specific use cases.

“We think of stablecoins as rails. Each stablecoin can be thought of as a global ACH (automated clearing house), where the consumer doesn’t see the complexity,” Mastercard Executive Vice President of Blockchain and Digital Assets Raj Dhamodharan told PYMNTS CEO Karen Webster during a recent episode of the PYMNTS “From the Block” podcast.

The irony of the stablecoin era may be that it strengthens the very players it was supposed to displace. By solving problems at the settlement layer, stablecoins create new capabilities. But they also create a need for orchestration, compliance, and distribution, and these are precisely the domains where incumbents excel.

In a world of tokenized assets and blockchain-based systems, the role of payment networks may simply expand to become platforms for value exchange across multiple forms of money, whether fiat, stablecoins or tokenized deposits.