Why Companies Are Racing to Centralize Treasury Operations

One wouldn’t expect a chef to prepare a meal by scrounging around disconnected kitchens where the ingredients were stored without labels.

But, in many ways, that’s the task that businesses are unwittingly setting their treasury and finance teams out on. After all, while at its core treasury management is about visibility into cash and where risks are embedded, that visibility is often compromised by fragmented systems, inconsistent processes and localized decision-making.

Fragmented treasury models, often distributed across regions or business units, inherently struggle to provide a coherent, real-time view of cash and liquidity. Data can be siloed across banking partners, enterprise systems and local processes. That was all well and good, or least wasn’t looked at too closely, when the macro landscape was a relatively predictable one.

Today’s operational environment, however, is one of persistent disruption. Interest rate swings, supply chain shocks, sanctions regimes and currency instability have created a business environment where financial positions can shift materially within hours, not quarters. In such conditions, delayed visibility can be strategically dangerous.

At the same time, advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and data analytics are raising the bar for what “good” treasury looks like.

In response, companies are rethinking how money moves across their organizations, and increasingly, they are arriving at the same conclusion: Centralization is no longer optional.

Read more: Can Your Treasury Function Put Money to Work Immediately?

Solving Fragmentation to Achieve Greater Visibility

By consolidating cash positioning, forecasting and risk management into a single framework, often supported by in-house banks or global treasury centers, organizations gain near-instant visibility into their financial posture. This visibility is not just broader; it is deeper, enabling treasury teams to assess exposures across currencies, entities and counterparties in a continuous, integrated manner.

Consider the alternative. In a decentralized model, decisions are often delayed by information gaps and coordination challenges. Local teams may act in silos, optimizing for their own needs rather than the enterprise as a whole. The result is inefficiency at best, and risk at worst.

With centralized visibility, treasury can move from reporting on what has happened to modeling what could happen. In practice, this means treasury is no longer just managing cash but is actively shaping corporate strategy. It becomes a partner to the CFO in evaluating investment opportunities, structuring financing and navigating complex global markets.

Simultaneously, artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping expectations for financial decision-making. From predictive cash forecasting to anomaly detection in payments and automated risk modeling, AI promises to elevate treasury from a transactional function to an insight engine.

Ben Ellis, senior vice president and global head of large and middle markets at Visa Commercial Solutions, told PYMNTS in an interview published Tuesday (March 10) that, among low-performing firms that adopted AI for working capital management, cash flow unpredictability later dropped from 68% to 17%.

The Time to Cash report from PYMNTS Intelligence found that 83.3% of surveyed chief financial officers are planning to use at least one AI tool to help with cash flow cycle improvements.

But this promise comes with a prerequisite that is often underestimated: data coherence.

See also: CFOs Become the Source of Truth as Data Sprawls Across B2B

Strategic Control Requires Integrated Decision-Making

AI systems are only as effective as the data they ingest. Fragmented treasury environments characterized by inconsistent data structures, disconnected systems and manual interventions can create exactly the kind of noise that undermines machine learning models. In such contexts, AI becomes an overlay on dysfunction rather than a driver of transformation.

Centralization addresses this at its root. By standardizing processes, harmonizing data and consolidating systems, it creates a clean, unified data environment that AI can operate on effectively.

As treasury becomes more strategically relevant, its role is expanding beyond liquidity management into broader domains such as capital allocation, working capital optimization and financial risk strategy.

This alignment is particularly critical in a multi-currency, multi-jurisdictional context. Centralized treasury can net exposures across entities, reducing the need for external hedging. It can pool cash globally, minimizing idle balances and borrowing costs. It can standardize banking structures, enhancing control and reducing operational risk.

Organizations that continue to rely on fragmented treasury structures risk more than inefficiency. They risk making decisions based on incomplete information, missing opportunities for optimization, and falling behind in the adoption of advanced analytics. Conversely, those that embrace centralization position themselves to leverage real-time data, deploy AI effectively and align financial decisions with strategic objectives.

For all PYMNTS B2B and digital transformation coverage, subscribe to the daily B2B and Digital Transformation Newsletters.