Connected Dining Report

Taste Trumps Restaurant Convenience for 70% of Travelers

November 2023

Whether on the road, exploring a new destination or just traveling for work, food quality, fine dining and taste drive restaurant choices. With taste taking on greater importance, 3 out of 4 consumers allow the allure of a fine dining experience to dictate their restaurant choices while away. In contrast, in their day-to-day lives, 82% prioritize convenience.

The 138 million U.S. consumers who travel each year eat at restaurants 20% more frequently than they do during their daily routines.
70% of traveling consumers said food quality is the top reason for selecting a restaurant when traveling and 36% report this as important.
49% of consumers use apps or websites to find restaurants while traveling, a slightly paradoxical figure as 53% use one when deciding where to dine at home.


Get Unlimited Access
Complete the form below for free, unlimited access to all our Data Studies, Trackers, and MonitorEdge reports.

Thank you for registering. Please confirm your email to view all our Trackers.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today
    By completing this form, I have read and acknowledged the terms and conditions.

    Approximately 138 million United States adults travel annually. As every traveler knows, life on the road can deviate wildly from the everyday. Perhaps nowhere is the difference more palpable than when it comes to finding something to eat. During their trips, U.S. consumers dine out at a restaurant 20% more than they do during their daily routines. On average, U.S. travelers take 4.2 trips a year, with 74% opting for restaurants during their journeys — a figure markedly higher than the 62% who dine out at home.

    Whether on the road, exploring a new destination or traveling for work, food quality, fine dining and taste drive restaurant choice. Half of consumers leverage apps or websites to discover restaurants — a practice slightly more prevalent in daily life and with notable differences in income level and generation.

    Despite the ubiquity of aggregators, a mere 4.4% utilized them for their most recent meal purchases at home. However, aggregator use jumps nearly four times when traveling, as 16% of consumers report consistently relying on them. Bridge millennials and affluent consumers report a greater preference for aggregator usage in their travels and daily lives.

    These are just a few findings reported in the 12th installment of the PYMNTS Intelligence Connected Dining series. For “Tracking the Impact of Digital Tools on Food Tourism and Travel Preferences,” we surveyed 2,061 U.S. consumers between Sept. 8 and Sept. 11 to better understand how consumer habits differ while traveling compared to their restaurant habits at home.

    Key Findings

    Consumers visit restaurants 20% more frequently when traveling than in their daily routines.

    Consumers report a 20% uptick in restaurant visits while traveling, making a clear connection between travel and dining out. Travel for many Americans has become an opportunity to pursue novel culinary experiences and food tourism. This trend underscores an ongoing evolution in consumer behavior: Activities such as dining out and trying new foods are pivotal in the travel experience.

    Travel is more than a change of scenery. It alters dining habits for the 74% of travelers who eat at restaurants while away from home. This figure represents a marked departure from the 62% who dine out as part of their regular routines. Generation Z consumers deviate from this trend in a somewhat striking way, however, as this cohort visits restaurants the least at 66%. Instead, Gen Z consumers prefer ready-to-eat meals the most, at 40%.

    Quality of food is the most important feature consumers consider when choosing a restaurant while traveling, trumping the convenience they prefer at home.

    Overall, the distinction between eating habits for travelers becomes even more profound when considering the underlying factors. While on the road, food quality, fine dining and taste dominate the decision-making process for consumers. In contrast, back home, 82% of consumers prioritize convenience, reinforcing the extent to which travel reshapes dining priorities and highlighting the different levels of significance that consumers place on the same criteria between daily dining and travel dining.

    For most consumers, travel magnifies the importance of food quality and authenticity. Seventy percent of consumers report the quality and experience of food sways their restaurant choices when traveling. Of these, 36% go so far as to label it the most crucial feature, a sentiment echoing the 46% who find food quality indispensable in travel and daily contexts. However, the pursuit of authentic flavors or the like matters most when traveling, with 52% placing a premium on local cuisine when away from home, outpacing daily preferences.

    Likewise, U.S. consumers cite local experiences and ambiance over promotions on the road. The novelty of the dining experience, represented by unique spaces and cuisine, has taken a greater importance over cost-savings for many. Roughly one-third of travelers underscore the importance of a restaurant’s view or ambiance influencing their decision to dine, while 45% value a restaurant’s proximity to their location while staying away from home.

    These elements resonate more deeply when compared to everyday dining preferences. The appeal of special deals and promotions matters less on the road, enticing a mere 1 in 4 travelers. In contrast, 36% of consumers prefer a good deal more during daily routines than traveling, signaling a shift in priorities with changing contexts.

    Travel appears to open consumers up to serendipity, with fewer consumers using apps or websites to find a restaurant while traveling.

    Digital platforms play a significant role in influencing consumers’ choice of restaurant. These sources of menu details, prices and the like have become pivotal in shaping consumers’ decisions when selecting dining options. Roughly half of respondents look to apps or websites to locate eateries while traveling.

    However, this figure is slightly lower than the 53% who do during their day-to-day routines. This trend is more pronounced among younger generations. Sixty-seven percent of millennials and 65% of Gen Z consumers seek insight offered by apps or websites for dining decisions during travels. For daily routines, 73% of both demographics look to apps and websites.

    When scouting a local spot, the opinions of friends and neighbors matters slightly more. High-income consumers, at 57%, cite a more pronounced preference for using digital platforms such as apps, social media or websites to uncover dining destinations when on the road. This preference contrasts with their low-income counterparts, with 38% exhibiting similar behavior. What’s more, high-income consumers represent the sole demographic that leans more heavily on these platforms during travel than in their day-to-day lives, representing a 57% to 54% split, respectively. This difference in behavior shows the role financial capacity plays in the digital exploration of dining experiences.

    Just 4.4% of consumers used aggregators in daily life for their most recent restaurant purchase. However, 16% of consumers always use them when traveling.

    Aggregator platforms, though prevalent elsewhere in the modern marketplace, are not the primary choice for consumers in their everyday restaurant selection. A mere 4.4% report using aggregators for their latest purchase. This use contrasts sharply with the habits of travelers, with nearly four times as many report they consistently rely on these platforms. Another 18% turn to them occasionally, resulting in roughly one-third of travelers employing aggregators at least sporadically during their journeys.

    Aggregator use is more prevalent among bridge millennials when traveling, at 30%. Additionally, 21% of high-income consumers leverage aggregators, contrasting the 12% of middle-income and 11% of low-income travelers. Some consumers may use aggregators more frequently on the road as a replacement for room service or dining at a hotel restaurant when these services are unavailable. For these consumers, convenience is key.

    Conclusion

    U.S. consumer behavior toward restaurant selection continues to shift. The differences in habits on the road versus at home highlight these differences. Notably, while half of consumers utilize digital platforms in daily life to identify dining options, this reliance does tick up during travel, especially among younger generations and high-income brackets.

    The data also reveals a divergence in the appeal of aggregators: While their use is minimal in everyday life, they become substantially more pertinent for travelers. Bridge millennials and affluent consumers exhibit higher tendencies to harness these platforms overall. For stakeholders in the restaurant and tech industries, understanding these evolving patterns is paramount, as they offer invaluable insights into market targeting and potential growth areas.

    Methodology

    Tracking the Impact of Digital Tools on Food Tourism and Travel Preferences,” an independently produced PYMNTS Intelligence report, is based on a survey of 2,061 U.S. consumers conducted from Sept. 8 to Sept. 11, 2023, examining consumers’ food tourism and food preferences while traveling. Our sample was balanced to match the U.S. census in several key variables: 56% of our respondents identified as female, 38% had college degrees and 41% reported annual incomes of more than $100,000


    Tracking the Impact of Digital Tools on Food Tourism and Travel Preferences” is the most recent installment of PYMNTS’ Connected Dining series. For more, read the previous edition, “Connected Dining: The Robot Will Take Your Order Now.”

    About

    PYMNTS INTELLIGENCE

    PYMNTS Intelligence is a leading global data and analytics platform that uses proprietary data and methods to provide actionable insights on what’s now and what’s next in payments, commerce and the digital economy. Its team of data scientists include leading economists, econometricians, survey experts, financial analysts and marketing scientists with deep experience in the application of data to the issues that define the future of the digital transformation of the global economy. This multilingual team has conducted original data collection and analysis in more than three dozen global markets for some of the world’s leading publicly traded and privately held firms.

    The PYMNTS Intelligence team that produced this report:
    Scott Murray, SVP and Head of Analytics
    Jimena Ferraro, PhD, Senior Analyst
    Adam Putz, PhD, Senior Writer


    We are interested in your feedback on this report. If you have questions or comments, or if you would like to subscribe to this report, please email us at feedback@pymnts.com.

    Disclaimer

    The Connected Dining Series may be updated periodically. While reasonable efforts are made to keep the content accurate and up to date, PYMNTS MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, REGARDING THE CORRECTNESS, ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, ADEQUACY, OR RELIABILITY OF OR THE USE OF OR RESULTS THAT MAY BE GENERATED FROM THE USE OF THE INFORMATION OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL SATISFY YOUR REQUIREMENTS OR EXPECTATIONS. THE CONTENT IS PROVIDED “AS IS” AND ON AN “AS AVAILABLE” BASIS. YOU EXPRESSLY AGREE THAT YOUR USE OF THE CONTENT IS AT YOUR SOLE RISK. PYMNTS SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY FOR ANY INTERRUPTIONS IN THE CONTENT THAT IS PROVIDED AND DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THE CONTENT, INCLUDING THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND NONINFRINGEMENT AND TITLE. SOME JURISDICTIONS DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN WARRANTIES, AND, IN SUCH CASES, THE STATED EX CLUSIONS DO NOT APPLY. PYMNTS RESERVES THE RIGHT AND SHOULD NOT BE LIABLE SHOULD IT EXERCISE ITS RIGHT TO MODIFY, INTERRUPT, OR DISCONTINUE THE AVAILABILITY OF THE CONTENT OR ANY COMPONENT OF IT WITH OR WITHOUT NOTICE.
    PYMNTS SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER, AND, IN PARTICULAR, SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR INCIDENTAL DAM AGES, OR DAMAGES FOR LOST PROFITS, LOSS OF REVENUE, OR LOSS OF USE, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THE CONTENT, WHETHER SUCH DAMAGES ARISE IN CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE, TORT, UNDER STATUTE, IN EQUITY, AT LAW, OR OTHERWISE, EVEN IF PYMNTS HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
    SOME JURISDICTIONS DO NOT ALLOW FOR THE LIMITATION OR EXCLUSION OF LIABILITY FOR INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, AND IN SUCH CASES SOME OF THE ABOVE LIMITATIONS DO NOT APPLY. THE ABOVE DISCLAIMERS AND LIMITATIONS ARE PROVIDED BY PYMNTS AND ITS PARENTS, AFFILIATED AND RELATED COMPANIES, CONTRACTORS, AND SPONSORS, AND EACH OF ITS RESPECTIVE DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, MEMBERS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, CONTENT COMPONENT PROVIDERS, LICENSORS, AND ADVISERS.
    Components of the content original to and the compilation produced by PYMNTS is the property of PYMNTS and cannot be reproduced without its prior written permission.
    The Connected Dining Series is a registered trademark of What’s Next Media & Analytics, LLC (“PYMNTS”).